top of page

From Crisis Management to Strategic Oversight: Leading through 2026 SEND Reforms

  • Writer: Janet
    Janet
  • Apr 22
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jun 13


Context

The Every Child Achieving and Thriving White Paper signals the biggest change to England’s SEND system since 2014. For those working closest to pupils, the 2026 reforms are more than an administrative update—they represent a fundamental shift in how inclusion is led and delivered.


For SENCOs and school leaders, this is a move away from a system driven by the “hunt for a diagnosis” and towards a genuinely needs-led approach. Below is the strategic reality of what the next three years are likely to demand from leadership teams.


1. The Death of the IEP: The Rise of the Statutory ISP


The most immediate change for many schools will be the introduction of Individual Support Plans (ISPs). In place of the mixed IEP/Pupil Passport formats used previously, the ISP becomes a standardised, statutory digital record.


  • The Strategic Shift: This is not simply a new template. Because ISPs are a legal requirement for all pupils at the “Targeted” level, they need to sit within your school’s data systems. Leadership teams must plan for the digital infrastructure and the staff training needed to keep ISPs as “living documents” that transfer smoothly at points of transition.


2. Standardised Inclusion: The End of the Postcode Lottery?


The proposed reforms introduce National Standards that define what “Ordinarily Available Provision” (OAP) should look like. By 2029, every school will be assessed against these benchmarks.


  • The Strategic Shift: The SENCO role shifts from “advocating for support” to “auditing against standards.” You will need to lead a whole-school review of your Universal and Targeted tiers: are classrooms genuinely “SEND-ready” as the default? Strategic leaders will use the next 18 months to strengthen adaptive teaching—particularly for early-career staff—so that high-quality classroom practice reduces demand on specialist interventions.


3. "Experts at Hand" and the Inclusion Base Model


A £1.8bn investment in the Experts at Hand service aims to place Speech and Language Therapists and Educational Psychologists back at the centre of mainstream practice. Alongside this, the requirement for secondary Inclusion Bases (with primary equivalents encouraged) will change how many schools think about their physical footprint.


  • The Strategic Shift: This will require fresh thinking about both space and staffing. Leaders must ask: Where will our Inclusion Base be located? How do we ensure it functions as a bridge back into mainstream classrooms, rather than a “silo” for our most vulnerable learners? Here, the SENCO role develops into a “Case Manager” for external specialists—ensuring their recommendations are embedded within the ISP.


4. Accountability: The New Inclusion Strategy


Schools will be required to publish a formal Inclusion Strategy, and it will sit at the centre of Ofsted’s new standalone inclusion judgement.


  • The Strategic Shift: This must be written jointly by the SENCO, Headteacher and Governors. It is not a “back-pocket” policy: it is a public roadmap showing how your budget and provision will meet the five new “Areas of Development” (replacing the previous four “Areas of Need”).


Final Thoughts


The 2026 reforms offer a genuine glimmer of hope for a more sustainable workload, largely by front-loading support through the ISP system. That said, the transition period—running through to 2030—will be complex to navigate. Our leadership task is to anchor staff in the new standards and, despite the language of “tiers” and “packages”, keep the child at the centre of every decision.


Secondary phase pupils learning in a classroom (Image: Microsoft Co-Pilot)


 
 
bottom of page